Peer Review Process

Peer Review Process
The review process in this journal applies a double-blind peer review method, the authors and reviewers do not know each 
other's identities. If the manuscript has passed the desk review stage, the editor will submit the manuscript to two reviewers
who are experts in the field of the submitted manuscript. The reviewer's task is to assess originality, clarity of presentation,
and contribution to agriculture science. The final decision on accepting a manuscript is solely determined by the editor based
on the reviewer's comments. Usually, reviewers will complete the review process within three weeks. Manuscripts that do
not pass the desk review process will not proceed to this stage and will be rejected. Submitted manuscripts are processed
within approximately 12 weeks from submission to publication. The review process is carried out as follows:
1. Overview. The editor will check the manuscript for suitability of the template, as well as focus, check plagiarism at 
a maximum of 25%, and the scope of the journal.
2. Peer review. The editor will send the manuscript to reviewers with double-blind peer review. In this peer-review process, 
the reviewer will provide the following recommendations: (1) accepted, if the manuscript can be accepted for publication;
(2) accepted after revision, the manuscript can be accepted for publication after undergoing revision in response to reviewer
comments within 7-14 days; and (3) rejected, if the manuscript cannot be accepted for publication. The editor does not
immediately accept the manuscript but requires revisions.
3. Final decision. The editor looks at the author's revisions before deciding whether the manuscript is accepted or rejected. 
The manuscript may still be rejected if the author does not make revisions according to the reviewer's comments. The final
decision on article acceptance is informed to the author by the Editor of Agrisistem Journal based on the reviewer's approval.

Proses Peer Review 
Proses review pada jurnal ini menerapkan metode double-blind peer review, penulis maupun reviewer tidak mengetahui 
identitas masing-masing. Apabila naskah sudah lolos tahap desk review, editor akan menyerahkan naskahnya kepada dua
orang reviewer yang ahli di bidang naskah yang diserahkan. Tugas reviewer adalah menilai orisinalitas, kejelasan penyajian,
dan kontribusi terhadap bidang pertanian. Keputusan akhir penerimaan naskah semata-mata ditentukan oleh editor
berdasarkan komentar reviewer. Biasanya, reviewer akan menyelesaikan proses review dalam waktu tiga minggu. Naskah
yang tidak lolos proses desk review tidak akan dilanjutkan ke tahap ini dan akan ditolak. Naskah yang diserahkan
diproses dalam waktu kurang lebih 12 minggu sejak penyerahan hingga publikasi. Proses peninjauan dilakukan sebagai berikut:
1. Overview. Editor akan memeriksa naskah dengan kesesuaian template, serta focus, cek plagiasi maksimal 25%, 
dan ruang lingkup jurnal.
2. Peer review. Editor akan mengirimkan naskah ke reviewer dengan peer review double-blind. Dalam proses peer-review ini, 
reviewer akan memberikan rekomendasi sebagai berikut: (1) diterima, jika naskah dapat diterima untuk diterbitkan;
(2) diterima dengan setelah revisi, Naskah dapat diterima untuk diterbitkan setelah mengalami revisi sebagai tanggapan atas
komentar reviewer dalam waktu 7-14 hari; dan (3) ditolak, jika naskah tidak dapat diterima untuk diterbitkan. Editor tidak
langsung menerima naskahnya tetapi memerlukan revisi.
3. Final decision. Editor mencermati revisi penulis sebelum memutuskan apakah naskah diterima atau ditolak. Naskah 
masih mungkin ditolak jika penulis tidak melakukan revisi sesuai komentar reviewer. Keputusan akhir penerimaan artikel
diinformasikan kepada penulis oleh Editor Jurnal Agrisistem berdasarkan persetujuan reviewer.